Matthew Kurian: ODAC Votes 6–3 Against Camizestrant Approval In SERENA-6

oncodaily - Matthew Kurian, Assistant Professor of Medicine at the University of Kentucky College of Medicine and Physician at St. Elizabeth Healthcare, shared a post on LinkedIn: “Breaking: ODAC Votes 6-3 Against Camizestrant Approval […]

AI Summary: An FDA oncology advisory committee delivered a 6–3 vote against approval of camizestrant following review of the SERENA‑6 trial, flagging concerns about the data package and the drug’s claimed “new paradigm.” The panel’s negative recommendation raises serious regulatory and commercial uncertainty for AstraZeneca’s oral SERD program and its path forward.


Implications for HR+/HER2- treatment landscape

2 months / oncodaily

2 months / oncodaily

2 months / oncodaily


ODAC rejects camizestrant approval

2 months / oncodaily

2 months / oncodaily

2 months / oncodaily

2 months / oncodaily

2 months / oncodaily

2 months / oncodaily


All Other Stories

2 months / oncodaily

2 months / oncodaily

2 months / oncodaily

2 months / oncodaily

2 months / oncodaily

2 months / oncodaily

2 months / oncodaily

2 months / oncodaily

2 months / oncodaily


Back to Top / Sat, May 2, 2026, 12:22 am / permalink 23098 / 20 stories in 2 months /



Blog Post
Headline: FDA oncology advisory panel votes 6–3 against camizestrant after SERENA‑6 review Key points - The FDA’s Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee (ODAC) voted 6–3 against approving AstraZeneca’s oral SERD camizestrant following review of the phase 3 SERENA‑6 trial. - Panel members concluded the trial did not demonstrate a “clinically meaningful” benefit and raised concerns about the overall data package and the sponsor’s characterization of the agent as a “new paradigm.” - SERENA‑6 targeted ESR1‑mutated, HR /HER2− breast cancer — a high‑interest molecular subgroup in modern breast oncology. - The meeting was the FDA’s first oncology advisory session in about nine months and focused in part on AstraZeneca programs. - Several practicing oncologists and academic physicians described the 6–3 vote as a meaningful negative signal, though ODAC recommendations are advisory and do not automatically determine the FDA’s final decision. Implications - The negative ODAC recommendation increases regulatory and commercial uncertainty for AstraZeneca’s camizestrant and its broader oral SERD program, complicating the path forward for approval and adoption. Sources: coverage of the ODAC meeting and reactions to the SERENA‑6 results.


Related Stories


FDA clears pivekimab sunirine (Decnupaz) as first BPDCN ADC / 6 wks

FDA to revisit Atara/Pierre Fabre cell therapy approval for rare lymphoma / 2 months

FDA greenlights datopotamab deruxtecan for metastatic TNBC / 14 days

FDA approves belzutifan (Welireg) plus pembrolizumab for adjuvant RCC / 21 days

FDA clears first all-oral regimen for certain newly diagnosed AML patients / 5 wks

VOLGA Phase III shows survival benefit for bladder cancer neoadjuvant combo / 1 month

New drug doubles one-year survival in metastatic pancreatic cancer / 2 months

StackHealth RSS


You can now follow topics by RSS - browse the complete list of topics, people, and organizations. Or, try Wildlife, FDA, Pediatric Oncology, Reproductive Health and look for the RSS link.





NorthFeed Inc. Terms and Conditions / Privacy Policy

Disclaimer: The information provided on this website is intended for general informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the content. Users are encouraged to verify all details independently. We accept no liability for errors, omissions, or any decisions made based on this information.